CONFIDEN FIAL
5. LORD GORONWY-ROBERTS MADE THE POINT THAT THE DECISION WAS
FOR THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT. THEY HAD TO BEAR IN MIND THE PRESSUPE
ON THEIR OWN SPACE AND SERVICES. THIS WAS A CRIMINAL RACKET. IF THE CROUP WAS ALLOWED TO STAY IT WOULD BE THE SIGNAL FOR FURTHER
AND LARGER INVASIONS. THE PROCESS MUST END SOMEWHERE. HE WOULD
BE PUTTING TO YOU THE POINTS OUTLINED IN PARAGRAPHS 2 AND 3 ALOVE
WHICH WERE UPPERMOST IN HIS OWN MIND.
LOPT CORONWY-ROBERTS THEN READ OUT PARAGRAPH (C) CF YOUR
TEL NO C48. WHEN MR ENNALS EXPRESSED DISBELIEF IN SOUTH VIETNAMESE ASSURANCES, LORD GORONWY-ROBERTS SAID THAT WE WOULD FOLLOW THEM UP IN SAIGON, WHEN SUCH ASSURANCES WERE FORMALLY MADE BETWEEN GOVERNMENTS THEY WERE ENTITLED TO ACT UPON THEM. FINALLY LORD GGRONWY-ROBERTS SAID THAT, WHILE HE WOULD PUT THESE POINTS TO YOU HE COULD GIVE NO UNDERTAKING ON WHAT YOUR DECISION OF SUBSTANCE
OR TIMING WOULD BE.
7. IT IS CLEAR THAT THE CRUX OF THE QUESTION IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ASYLUM IN THIRD COUNTRIES AND THE CHANCES OF MALTREATMENT ON
PETURN TO SOUTH VIETNAM, ON THE LATTER POINT LORD GORONWY-ROBERTS WOULD BE GRATEFUL IF HM AMBASSADOR SAIGON WOULD ASK THE SOUTH
VIETNAMESE GOVERNMENT TO REAFFIRM THE ASSURANCES GIVEN BY THEIR CONSUL GENERAL IN HONG KONG. HE SHOULD ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR, THAT IF RETURN WAS AGREED, HMG WOULD EXPECT THESE ASSURANCES TO PE FULFILLED. ON THE QUESTION OF TIME TO FIND POSSIBLE ASYLUM IM THIRD COUNTRIES FOR SOME OR ALL OF THE PARTY, LORD GOPONWY-ROBERTS AGREES THAT IT MUST BE LEFT TO YOU TO DECIDE WHAT IS REASONABLE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES. IF YOU ARE SATISFIED THAT ALL THE ABOVE POINTS ARE MET WE AGREE TO A RETURN TO VIETNAM AS PROPOSED,
· CALLAGHAN
FILES
MKIOD
SEAD
MVD
LEGAL ADVISERS
PS
PS/LORD GORONWY ROBERTS PS/MR ENNALS
2
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 105Page 106
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.