TNAG-0488-FCO40-553-Review-of-death-sentence-in-Hong-Kong-1974 — Page 93

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

GOVERNMENT HOUSE

HONG KONG

116

香港總督府

II

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

SCR 7/3231/56

Then Andrew,

Jes

110

August.

RECLIVED

REGISTRY No.52

17 SEP 1974

B+KK14/1

DEATH

PENALTY

12th September 1974

CAST

R2F.

1/5

Rs R ARs 46/1

Many thanks for your letter of 29th

The comments of the Executive Council were very much to the point. The answer as drafted for Mr. Hattersley was only a half truth. On another occasion I do not see why the same wording should not be used as that in paragraph 2 of Lord Goronwy Robert's letter to Ben Ford of 26 July. The formal constitutional position is that, while the prerogative of mercy is delegated to the Governor, the Queen's residual prerogative which is exercised on the advice of the Secretary of State - ensures that the latter may overrule the Governor if he so wishes.

2.

The Creech-Jones doctrine represented a substantial restriction of the circumstances in which intervention by the Secretary of State could be contemplated. Now that this doctrine has been abandoned, the situation is once more as stated above. My own preference is naturally that the present position should be made clear in any future public statements on the matter. However, what Unofficials, and the public generally, really resent is the impossibility of implementing death sentences passed by the courts, and the constitutional niceties, so far as they are concerned, are of secondary importance.

I don't think there is any misunderstanding among Ex. Co. members about the likelihood of a change

3.

}

3)

sent

copy to Sis D.nl 2) 12. Dinwiddy to

A.C. Stuart Esq.,

Hong Kong & Indian Ocean Department, Foreign & Commonwealth Office,

London, S.W.1.

PA

BD

CONFIDENTIAL

12/9

ACS17/4

Lar

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.