TNAG-0408-FCO40-454-Allegations-of-bribery-and-corruption-in-the-Hong-Kong-polic-1973 — Page 95

1

Dis

Reference....

Jarran

Mr Stewart.

I attended.

***

a meeting this from in Sio Nothes Frattan-Bellew's Office at which Mr Rober (ASE, Hang Kany), MY Wellow & M Sitch +

One other offrent from aday wire

I had no.

the rmecting

Chathaka

proveite.

to look at the papers before

4. had to fileny it by ear.

2. Disciplinary Regulation.

Mr Roberts wanted to armand the relwand

Regulation

in order to provide that descepten ve

proceedings might. still be initiated against

a

1 2

officer despite the fact that he might haver

been acquitted on

cominal charge,

(? Rig

The rest of those prevent wire opposes. To see

a change and

the new

the poun't

was made that'

Prevention of Corruptions Bill, all

pubished in Hong Kong, contained some freting

привеление

draconian provisions

conciones

Sarric was com

no

four

G<

3. Desciplinary Procedings (Cor Rays).

civil

Mr Robist agreed that the worss "who is not

legally qualified but

Reg. 8(5) mm) of

should be omitted from

увечно

(5/4)). Sur

founted out that the

this dift, Rego at

Arthur Grattan-Bellewd pouited

است

inclusion of these works could for

wimpression that the Gust, did not went the

to be represented by anyone

qualifications.

In my

15ef an

event,

wlts ope

I woul

pins wines Ar