1
Dis
Reference....
Jarran
Mr Stewart.
I attended.
***
a meeting this from in Sio Nothes Frattan-Bellew's Office at which Mr Rober (ASE, Hang Kany), MY Wellow & M Sitch +
One other offrent from aday wire
I had no.
the rmecting
Chathaka
proveite.
to look at the papers before
4. had to fileny it by ear.
2. Disciplinary Regulation.
Mr Roberts wanted to armand the relwand
Regulation
in order to provide that descepten ve
proceedings might. still be initiated against
a
1 2
officer despite the fact that he might haver
been acquitted on
cominal charge,
(? Rig
The rest of those prevent wire opposes. To see
a change and
the new
the poun't
was made that'
Prevention of Corruptions Bill, all
pubished in Hong Kong, contained some freting
привеление
draconian provisions
conciones
Sarric was com
no
four
G<
3. Desciplinary Procedings (Cor Rays).
civil
Mr Robist agreed that the worss "who is not
legally qualified but
Reg. 8(5) mm) of
should be omitted from
увечно
(5/4)). Sur
founted out that the
this dift, Rego at
Arthur Grattan-Bellewd pouited
است
inclusion of these works could for
wimpression that the Gust, did not went the
to be represented by anyone
qualifications.
In my
15ef an
event,
wlts ope
I woul
pins wines Ar