TNAG-0318-FCO40-354-Legislation-for-immigration-and-deportation-in-Hong-Kong-1971 — Page 247

Clause 16 (not clance 17): Hong Kong have replies

in paras 344

They

Lave reduced from

5 years

にら

the period specified in

years

clause 17 (c) of the Bill but have otherwise

stuck to their grens

the

toms of

and have referred

House of Lords,

تا

the 0.45. Immigration Bill, now,

in passage through the

Their comparison, with the latter correct?

Cemiz 176

now clause

18):

: See para 5 of 3. Hong Kong have made a minor modification but again have referred to the U.M, Bill as justifying thei's altitude.

(Cause

55(2):

số (2) Hong Kong

have agreed

to the

deletion of

نستا

clause.

whics

Curte

in

issue.

7.

There care

2. So that it is really the new clauses 17+18

a couple of other ponti-

elance

17.(1)(c) uses

the expression

an

which is not

-)

defined. In

had used

Chapt

عليمية

undesirable immigrant

In the earlier version of the Bill they

the expression.

is in the opinition of

undesirable person

still what they;

7.50

ви

time

an mingiant who

This is presumably

тало

15

incans

that Bicher's

Clause 57 = this; seems,

subjects will require visas for entering Hang but would presumably be exempted

Kong