Clause 16 (not clance 17): Hong Kong have replies
in paras 344
They
Lave reduced from
5 years
にら
the period specified in
years
clause 17 (c) of the Bill but have otherwise
stuck to their grens
the
toms of
and have referred
House of Lords,
تا
the 0.45. Immigration Bill, now,
in passage through the
Their comparison, with the latter correct?
Cemiz 176
now clause
18):
: See para 5 of 3. Hong Kong have made a minor modification but again have referred to the U.M, Bill as justifying thei's altitude.
(Cause
55(2):
số (2) Hong Kong
have agreed
to the
deletion of
نستا
clause.
whics
Curte
in
issue.
7.
There care
2. So that it is really the new clauses 17+18
a couple of other ponti-
elance
17.(1)(c) uses
the expression
an
which is not
-)
defined. In
had used
Chapt
عليمية
undesirable immigrant
In the earlier version of the Bill they
the expression.
is in the opinition of
undesirable person
still what they;
7.50
ви
time
an mingiant who
This is presumably
тало
15
incans
that Bicher's
Clause 57 = this; seems,
subjects will require visas for entering Hang but would presumably be exempted
Kong