TNAG-0200-FCO40-236-Divorce-rules-1970 — Page 51

Mr. Rushford,

Reference......

will (26)

Please see Hong Kong's sowing despatch at

(26), and also folio (20).

with

Hong Kong received a

copy of the draft S.I. despatel & 3rd October (16), although the

minor points

on the draft, raised by Bourne, at (17),

and Caualley, (18), have not been referred. Presumably,

if it

is agreed that we proced

requested by

Hong Kong,

we would not need to await their

comments on

these points?

that there is some wisdom in

PAL), Call

making Rules which are appropriate for only

I should be grateful for

year,

but

Paragraph (2) 8 (26)

your

views.

con await consideration until

the present Rules are made

Afg

I assume

авите?

2 nad december 1969.

:

Mr Murray

It seems

Mr Rushford is

さ

away

an hel

to all their,

from p.22 82 that the reason for wanting the rules to be made now are giver in raving deppated

1

to, 209 of the 9th February, 1968, which dore not seem to be in the Fite. May I see it?

J. Brett

3.12.69

Sir L. Brett

My apologies. The previous file

attacked - folio

✓ refers.

Pain Hay

K.245.

4.12.69.