COIDATLL
avoid pressure from industrial sector Bo Otho delegations, while recognising
the inadvisability of subsisting a list ♫ excepting to the OCD on
1st March 1965, nevertheless thought the possild lity should not be excluded
of drawing up such a list at a leter etage.
Other questions
The delegatione noted that the following questions were to be studied
se vretely at later datel
Charlie le
from
The delegations tuok note of a working document the demission Aercice contrining "ropotals regarâimų semitive products in the sectors
of chemicals and rubber. In this corneolien, he represort tive of the Commission drew attention to the or rout uncertainty as to the C Lovel
far there products, depending on the attitude arken b. the US, rticularly on the subject of the AF. He pointed cut that the Corticcion ressived the
lie
right to ke specific ropesels in this field.
Cotton Textilee and jute roducts
The representative of the foniscion pointed out tab for roducts
covered by the long tera agreement, the tnting of e Tolera.ce was orly
possible within the li-its of the quɔtos specifled og blat cgrcement.
ALW Antandels
t
In ely to a query from the Italian delegation regarding law silk, the representative of the Comington snia shut according to the definiti recommanded by the Scoretoriat of UNCTAD (1), this pro-luctý is ta be
Goldered as a rilary, fuduct and world thư be ozçləried frɔn refcrential
troctment. In this o、ntext, the German Colegation sugported thet to remove
in
19 uncertainty a list should be trewn up of sou acteriels et resort subject
to custo is duties.
(1) cf. doc. UNCTADD/5/0.2/3 of 2 July 1965.
CODENTAL
-7-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.