TNAG-0041-FCO40-77-Future-Sovereignty-of-Hong-Kong-Defence-Review-Working-Party-1967 — Page 156

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

TOP SECRET

to try to secure some other option than that of simply being abandoned to Communist China. These include about 5,000 (or one half) of the police, some 2,000 to 3,000 in the public service, and

the rest would be professional or semi-professional people. By no

means all of them are people to whom Government has any obligation, other than to seek some kind of "safe conduct" guarantee to enable

them to go where they wished and could get to under their own

arrangements: many, for instance, have contacts in Taiwan, the

United States, Canada and this country, and would get out under their

own arrangements provided they were not prevented from doing so,

But there are undoubtedly some, especially in the police and

Administration, to whom we are morally committed, and who would need

help. Probably a good number of them would wish to go to Taiwan, if

they could be helped to get there but would Peking ever countenance

-

our helping persons of Chinese descent to get to Taiwan? It might be

necessary to contemplate bringing a fair number of hard core cases

to the U.K., pending decisions on their resettlement.

11. We asked the Governor and the C. B. F. whether there was any

contingency planning that could usefully be undertaken at this stage.

They were both categorical that this could not possibly be undertaken

in Hong Kong, or even in Singapore. Their reason is that for any

such planning to be at all meaningful a fairly wide circle of people in Hong Kong would necessarily have to be involved. This would, in

their view, entail an unacceptable risk of leakage; and they believe (we felt rightly) that if public opinion in Hong Kong once suspected

that there was contingency planning for a possible British withdrawal,

that would lead to a very serious collapse of public and police morale, with public opinion swinging right against us. This would

create a situation which the Communists would be quick to exploit,

and would probably encourage them to try an all-out confrontation.

We should then find ourselves quickly in desperate straits.

12.

To put it shortly, Sir David Trench and General Worsley believe

that there is nothing we can do at present to organise a general

withdrawal from Hong Kong, or to plan for that contingency. They

stated more than once that they believe we are trapped in Hong Kong;

and that our only possible stance for the time being is to do our

level best to stay there on our terms, frankly recognising that if

we fail we are more likely to face capitulation than the possibility of an orderly withdrawal. They feel that we have no option but to sweat it out on this basis, if we possibly can, until the post-Mao

period, in the hope that we might then get back to a less dangerous

relationship with mainland China. They both add the rider that if

we do succeed in riding out the present storm and can achieve once

again the kind of relationship which Hong Kong had with China prior

TOP SECRET

to the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.