AnnualReport-1933 — Page 250

Administrative Reports 行政報告書 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next Source

G (1) 2

7. Comparative figures for the years 1932 and 1933 are given below:-

COMPANIES LIQUIDATION.

BANKRUPTCY.

Year Discharges granted Receiving Orders rescinded Adjudication annulled Assets for distribution Estimated Liabilities Fees in Stamps Official Receiver's Commission Possession Fees Unclaimed Balances transferred to General Revenue 1933 4 3 41 28 13 25 17 30 1,406,700.21 1,409,173.01 5,557.35 19,003.31 5,196 191.49 1932 4 1 42 15 27 31 26 28 397,638.09 991,452.64 5,550.20 12,805.17 1,216 574.26

REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS.

8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceding year, although a smaller number of certificates was granted. This is accounted for by the fact that a larger number of existing registrations was renewed:

Opposed Registration.

9. Three applications for registration were opposed during the year. In one case judgment was given in favour of the opponents. The other two oppositions are still pending.

Edit History

2026-05-09 13:00:53 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
G (1) 2 7. Comparative figures for the years 1932 and 1933 are given below:- COMPANIES LIQUIDATION. BANKRUPTCY. Year Discharges granted Receiving Orders rescinded Adjudication annulled Assets for distribution Estimated Liabilities Fees in Stamps Official Receiver's Commission Possession Fees Unclaimed Balances transferred to General Revenue 1933 4 3 41 28 13 25 17 30 1,406,700.21 1,409,173.01 5,557.35 19,003.31 5,196 191.49 1932 4 1 42 15 27 31 26 28 397,638.09 991,452.64 5,550.20 12,805.17 1,216 574.26 REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS. 8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceding year, although a smaller number of certificates was granted. This is accounted for by the fact that a larger number of existing registrations was renewed: Opposed Registration. 9. Three applications for registration were opposed during the year. In one case judgment was given in favour of the opponents. The other two oppositions are still pending.
Baseline (Original)
G (1) 2 7. Comparative figures for the years 1932 and 1933 are given below:- COMPANIES LIQUIDATION. BANKRUPTCY. A 1933 4 3 41 28 13 25 17 30 I 6 1932 ல 1 42 15 27 31 26 28 4 Year. Discharges granted. Receiving Orders | rescinded Adjudication annulled. Assets for dis- tribution. Estimated Liabilities. Fees in Stamps. Official Receiver's Com- mission. Possession Fees. 7 CO 6 1 consolidated. Unclaimed Balances transferred to General Revenue. C. $ e. C. G. $ C. 19331 4 I 406.700.21 | 1,409,173.01 5,557.35 19,003.315,196 191.49 1932 4 1 397,638.09 991,452.64 5,550.20 12.805.17 1,216 574.26 REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS. Revenue. 8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceeding year, although a smaller number of certificates was granted. This is accounted for by the fact that a larger number of existing registrations was renewed: Opposed Registration. 9. Three applications for registration were opposed during the year. In one case judgment was given in favour of the opponents. The other two oppositions are still pending.
2026-05-09 13:00:53 · Baseline
View content

G (1) 2

7. Comparative figures for the years 1932 and 1933 are given below:-

COMPANIES LIQUIDATION.

BANKRUPTCY.

A

1933 4

3 41 28 13 25

17

30

I 6

1932

ல

1

42 15

27

31

26 28

4

Year.

Discharges

granted.

Receiving Orders | rescinded

Adjudication annulled.

Assets

for dis- tribution.

Estimated Liabilities.

Fees in Stamps.

Official Receiver's Com- mission.

Possession Fees.

7

CO

6

1

consolidated.

Unclaimed

Balances transferred

to

General Revenue.

C. $

e.

C.

G.

$

C.

19331

4

I 406.700.21 | 1,409,173.01

5,557.35

19,003.315,196

191.49

1932

4

1

397,638.09 991,452.64 5,550.20

12.805.17 1,216

574.26

REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS.

Revenue.

8. The revenue derived from the registration of trade marks showed an increase over that for the preceeding year, although a smaller number of certificates was granted. This is accounted for by the fact that a larger number of existing registrations was renewed:

Opposed Registration.

9. Three applications for registration were opposed during the year. In one case judgment was given in favour of the opponents. The other two oppositions are still pending.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.