AnnualReport-1930 — Page 72

Administrative Reports 行政報告書 All AI Reviewed

Hon. C. S.

A (2) 26

If the Government is satisfied that a two weeks penalty of $200 is sufficient in this case for a delay of 58 weeks on a six months contract for over $16,000 I have nothing more to say.

But I should like definite authority to pass this.

(Sgd.) P. L. COLLISSON,

Auditor.

10.3.31.

Hon. C. S.

I fear I was misled (as I think was the Treasurer) by the words "The date due for completion was 7/9/30" and "The contractor was fined two weeks at $200" at the foot of page 4. The release having been approved and carried through will you approve this retrospectively.

Approved accordingly by command.

(Intd.) N. L. S.

12.3.31.

(Sgd.) E. R. HALLIFAX,

12.3.31

CONTRACT No. 66 of 1929.

Hon. C. S.

Through Hon. Treasurer.

Summarised, the accounting history of this contract is as follows:-

1. Security deposited 22nd November, 1929

2. Work commenced 18th December, 1929

3. Work completed 5th February, 1930

4. Bill submitted March, 1930

5. Amount agreed to May, 1930

6. First and only payment August, 1930

7. No retention money held.

8. Release of security authorised 4th February, 1931 or 60 weeks after the commencement of work on a 7 weeks contract.

Edit History

2026-05-09 04:17:33 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

Hon. C. S. A (2) 26 If the Government is satisfied that a two weeks penalty of $200 is sufficient in this case for a delay of 58 weeks on a six months contract for over $16,000 I have nothing more to say. But I should like definite authority to pass this. (Sgd.) P. L. COLLISSON, Auditor. 10.3.31. Hon. C. S. I fear I was misled (as I think was the Treasurer) by the words "The date due for completion was 7/9/30" and "The contractor was fined two weeks at $200" at the foot of page 4. The release having been approved and carried through will you approve this retrospectively. Approved accordingly by command. (Intd.) N. L. S. 12.3.31. (Sgd.) E. R. HALLIFAX, 12.3.31 CONTRACT No. 66 of 1929. Hon. C. S. Through Hon. Treasurer. Summarised, the accounting history of this contract is as follows:- 1. Security deposited 22nd November, 1929 2. Work commenced 18th December, 1929 3. Work completed 5th February, 1930 4. Bill submitted March, 1930 5. Amount agreed to May, 1930 6. First and only payment August, 1930 7. No retention money held. 8. Release of security authorised 4th February, 1931 or 60 weeks after the commencement of work on a 7 weeks contract.

Baseline (Original)

Hon. C. S. A (2) 26 If the Government is satisfied that a two weeks penalty of $200 is sufficient in this case for a delay of 58 weeks on a six months contract for over $16,000 I have nothing more to But I should like definite authority to pass this. say. (Sgd.) P. L. COLLISSON, Auditor. 10.3.31. Hon. C. S. I fear I was misled (as I think was the Treasurer) by the words "The date due for completion was 7/9/30" and "The contractor was fined two weeks at $200" at the foot of page 4. The release having been approved and carried through will you approve this retrospectively. Approved accordingly by command. (Intd.) N. L. S. 12.3.31. (Sgd.) E. R. HALLIFAX, 12.3.31 CONTRACT No. 66 of 1929. Hon. C. S. Through Hon. Treasurer. Summarised, the accounting history of this contract is as follows:- 1. Security deposited 2. Work commenced 3. Work completed 4. Bill submitted 5. Amount agreed to 6. First and only payment 7. No retention money held. 22nd November. 1929 18th December, 1929 5th February, 1930 March, 1930 May, 1930 August, 1930 8. Release of security authorised 4th February, 1981 or 60 weeks after the commencement of work on a 7 weeks contract.

2026-05-09 04:17:33 · Baseline

View content

Hon. C. S.

A (2) 26

If the Government is satisfied that a two weeks penalty of $200 is sufficient in this case for a delay of 58 weeks on a six months contract for over $16,000 I have nothing more to

But I should like definite authority to pass this.

say.

(Sgd.) P. L. COLLISSON,

Auditor.

10.3.31.

Hon. C. S.

I fear I was misled (as I think was the Treasurer) by the words

"The date due for completion was 7/9/30" and "The contractor was fined two weeks at $200" at the foot of page 4. The release having been approved and carried through will you approve this retrospectively.

Approved accordingly by command.

(Intd.) N. L. S.

12.3.31.

(Sgd.) E. R. HALLIFAX,

12.3.31

CONTRACT No. 66 of 1929.

Hon. C. S.

Through Hon. Treasurer.

Summarised, the accounting history of this contract is as

follows:-

1. Security deposited

2. Work commenced

3. Work completed

4. Bill submitted

5. Amount agreed to

6. First and only payment

7. No retention money held.

22nd November. 1929

18th December, 1929

5th February, 1930

March, 1930

May, 1930

August, 1930

8. Release of security authorised 4th February, 1981

or 60 weeks after the commencement of work on a 7 weeks contract.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.