CO537-4320 — Page 7

se 42 (1) of the Telem Ord. He would of course have to ascertain who then these an any promisions of the Telecon Ord. which cuflict with the H.K. Telephone Ord but I do not

see why this should be.

I also pointed out that such ordinances unally contain penalters for the improper disclosure of information.

similar

I cannot find any

see in the Telephone Ord, there an prossimes of this nature in the sees 18-20 4 the Telecom. Ind.

I am not certain therefore whether the disclosure of the communicaties by the Telephone to would be an offence. of it is still consydered necmary

to amend the Telephone Ord 1925 I would suggest that the abgest of the assudment might be disguised

by montury a section to prevent the interception disclosure of any telephone communication without the an of the Goremer. This might be regarded

to protect the public.

authority

I have looked through the Oromances in other Colinces

but cannot find any which ences this quafic part

mcept Belames Telecom that 184) where see 238 26

might be said to apply, be this hoveur, both the Telephone &

coused by the same act a the

He Telegraph system

definiten of "Telecommunication

"

cours both telegraphin

telephone communication.

I shit a draft in there lines.

of the legal adrious que

Wallhall

M. Halls i

I have ho

dojection to it

>

for the trouble he has taken

am paraful

in

this

malir.

Men 23/7