I have since consulted for Webster, who was P.M.G. Palestine, about the interception & monitoring of Telephone
Comms in Palestine. He said this was
a noual
proceeding could be connected through the exchange & which cabled
& that the C...D. had special apparaters which
them to rebut a neunter of different lines to lester into a
monitor without the unchange operators ling
fact. The aggreates
office itulf.
of the apparently cartulled from the (...)). "The "legal backing" for this " "interception
A
"disclosure" of a comminuation
as 49(1) of
He Palestine Part office Ordinance. This was stretched to
include telephone commsation, because "telegraph
a
live, wise or other apperatus used for the
of telegraphic
tilephmir cannamination
рифон
އ
As I stated at the wrecteup the 0.1.0 sotrictions inforced.
m that fue co
legend out a ordinance in the O.K which
A
specfically gave authority to intercept a moita telephone
conversation. In the my unlikely went of this right hip
questined, a if
an anover had to be given, they would portably take refuge in the deportion of telegraphy
include
any
apparaters for transmetting rexages or other communications
by
of elective signals."
you will notice that are 49 of the Palestine Pust office
similar to see 4 of the Hong Kong
Orduance is
ногу
Telecommunication Grd 1936. Unfortunately ere 42(1) of
He H. Kay and says the provisions "shall not apply... to the concernas granted by Ordinance to the H.K. Telephone to Ltd"?
might suggest to the for that a simpler & les public way of attaining his abject would be to amend
I think me
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.