CO537-37 — Page 493

2981. -

Blynn C

916

217

have only out it 10 feet 9 or 10 feet 8, but before

the hill is paid, he han, to do his work - what he has

charged for

into.

·

according to the contract he has entered

24.113

244 13

A.

Mr Shelton Tooper:-

14

The Chairman:-

A.

ว

Put might it not be that the dispute might have ariseį

that he was laying out a new cametery, and he was paid

in instalments for the work, if he charged twice over

for the same terrace ?

we could not do that, because I measured. it up myself,

accompanied by an Inspector.

But does he always accept your figures ?

Te has to,

24.114

24.115

And has thère ever been a case in which he has not

accepted your figures, and you have had to amend them?

I dont remember auch a case. If there was any disputs

About that, it could easily be settled. As far as T

recollect, Sir,' no such dispute arose.

24.116.

The dispute I believe was, if such a dispute did tak

place, that Too Sik said he had laid out a tranch

had not been paid for. It was stated that the bil

been paid for twice over. There was some discussion.

and I believe the matter was referred to you.

לי

A.

It is the first 7 have heard of it. I never heard of

such a case. I dont remember of such a discussion

taking place.

24.117

Dr Barnett and Dr Macfarlane were with you at the

time.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

537

A.

Vight I ask when this occurred, Sir Nothing of the

sort has been referred to me.

24.14

18

2.

Apparently some time in June, I suppose 1905, because

A.

Dr Farnett was here at the time.

June 1905. I did not return to the Colony until the

latter and of November.

1.9

Q.

It might have been the June before,

371

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

A PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH

PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

24. 149