2981. -
Blynn C
916
217
have only out it 10 feet 9 or 10 feet 8, but before
the hill is paid, he han, to do his work - what he has
charged for
into.
·
according to the contract he has entered
24.113
244 13
A.
Mr Shelton Tooper:-
14
The Chairman:-
A.
ว
Put might it not be that the dispute might have ariseį
that he was laying out a new cametery, and he was paid
in instalments for the work, if he charged twice over
for the same terrace ?
we could not do that, because I measured. it up myself,
accompanied by an Inspector.
But does he always accept your figures ?
Te has to,
24.114
24.115
And has thère ever been a case in which he has not
accepted your figures, and you have had to amend them?
I dont remember auch a case. If there was any disputs
About that, it could easily be settled. As far as T
recollect, Sir,' no such dispute arose.
24.116.
The dispute I believe was, if such a dispute did tak
place, that Too Sik said he had laid out a tranch
had not been paid for. It was stated that the bil
been paid for twice over. There was some discussion.
and I believe the matter was referred to you.
לי
A.
It is the first 7 have heard of it. I never heard of
such a case. I dont remember of such a discussion
taking place.
24.117
Dr Barnett and Dr Macfarlane were with you at the
time.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
537
A.
Vight I ask when this occurred, Sir Nothing of the
sort has been referred to me.
24.14
18
2.
Apparently some time in June, I suppose 1905, because
A.
Dr Farnett was here at the time.
June 1905. I did not return to the Colony until the
latter and of November.
1.9
Q.
It might have been the June before,
371
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
A PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
24. 149