CO537-37 — Page 315

}

لے

!

31785

23

klegut: 100-

A

..

A.

No.

2:55.

743

Well, that the secretarial work of the Department was 2377

Buch that when you wanted information, you could not

lay your hand on it ?

Yes, and the reason was that until I looked into the

matter three or four years ago, they were not indexed.

I have had that done, but it has taken years to do 1.

And that is what you complain about ?

$6

Q.

A.

Yes.

77

.

23176

A.

And that is what you referred to in pour provique 23/77

evidence ?

Yes. (Tc Mr Shelton Hooper) You wish to ask me ař out,

the lime washing contract and Swa Iu.

Shelton Hooper:-

You,

as to the amount ?

78 A.

23178

The first contract was, - I have found out thé astalis

here,

lime washing contract for 1903. It arose un

a minuth from the M. 0. H. on the 1154 February 1903,

asking if thers was any written contrast for the limo washing of infected houses. It appeared that Inara

| TTT |

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

GO. 537

There was none ?

wan none.

19

Q..

A.

::

NO

23175

up to that date, The-quarterl, inspacting

Committee drew attention to this, and it was brought

before the Board, and then the Board decided that 1

would he advisable for a contract to be entered into,

23180

and tenders were called for, and tenners received.

There were 11 tanders rsosived.

&

*

What was the highest ?

A.

37

The cheapest was Ön Ker, $1.50 per floor, and the

highest ma Chan Kin, $4.50 per floor.

81 A.

And whose tender was accepted ?

A.

23187

On Kou's, the cheapest, but it mas fauna unsatisfact- ory, and the Board recommiuered the matter. If you

renamber,

there was a lot of correspondence between

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

Page 315Page 316

}