}
لے
!
31785
23
klegut: 100-
A
..
A.
No.
2:55.
743
Well, that the secretarial work of the Department was 2377
Buch that when you wanted information, you could not
lay your hand on it ?
Yes, and the reason was that until I looked into the
matter three or four years ago, they were not indexed.
I have had that done, but it has taken years to do 1.
And that is what you complain about ?
$6
Q.
A.
Yes.
77
.
23176
A.
And that is what you referred to in pour provique 23/77
evidence ?
Yes. (Tc Mr Shelton Hooper) You wish to ask me ař out,
the lime washing contract and Swa Iu.
Shelton Hooper:-
You,
as to the amount ?
78 A.
23178
The first contract was, - I have found out thé astalis
here,
lime washing contract for 1903. It arose un
a minuth from the M. 0. H. on the 1154 February 1903,
asking if thers was any written contrast for the limo washing of infected houses. It appeared that Inara
| TTT |
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
GO. 537
There was none ?
wan none.
19
Q..
A.
::
NO
23175
up to that date, The-quarterl, inspacting
Committee drew attention to this, and it was brought
before the Board, and then the Board decided that 1
would he advisable for a contract to be entered into,
23180
and tenders were called for, and tenners received.
There were 11 tanders rsosived.
&
*
What was the highest ?
A.
37
The cheapest was Ön Ker, $1.50 per floor, and the
highest ma Chan Kin, $4.50 per floor.
81 A.
And whose tender was accepted ?
A.
23187
On Kou's, the cheapest, but it mas fauna unsatisfact- ory, and the Board recommiuered the matter. If you
renamber,
there was a lot of correspondence between
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
Page 315Page 316
}