CO537-37 — Page 30

CO537 Colonial Confidential Records 理藩院機密檔案 All

:

20

2540.

individuals did 7

A.

Yes.

Q.

Au

466

And that is the reason why you charged the Sanitary 26858

Board 50 cents per floor more than you did the private

ones ?

A.

Yes.

59

Q.

24859

Well now, when you did the limewashing for the private

individuals, did the Sanitary Board Inspectors pass 14

for you if you did not do the walls of the backyard

right up to the roof ?

A.

60 2.

Yes they passed it if it was up to the first floor.

Did the Sanitary Inspectors always pass your work that

you did for private individuals ?

20860

A.

Always said it was not proper.

Q.

Were you ever summoned because it was not proper? 26861

До

Not at the Magistracy.

62

Q.

20862

A.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

། ། ། ། www.O. 587

37

RECORD OFFICE, OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-

LONDON

630.

But you had to pay money ?

I was not fined.

Not at the Magistracy, but did you used to give a 20863

little cumshaw instead of being fined at the

Magistracy?

I did not give any money to anyone. After I did it 3

or 4 times, they said it was not done properly, and no

wages were given to me,

64 20

Who by

A.

Q.

A.

A.

67 Q.

A.

20864

The Inspectors would not sign the paper saying it was

proper.

20:45

And no the owners who employed you, never paid you. Is

that what you mean?

You are asking me about the private work ?

Yes, those that you were paid $1.20`a floor for. 20866

The papara passing the work were not signed.

20467

And you never had occasion to give any present to the

Sanitary Inspectors?

I have not given any,

Page 30Page 31

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.