CO537-36 — Page 474

xia

ما

his Homper

150-4 Q.

$3-

A.

A.

5-6 00

1657

What are we to go by. Hár

particular state of affa

and we try to remedy

to those concerned, und un

must look for the minimum ↑

gr Reaser at

649

mayal etti a 13954

ing from veure past,

stle huen as possible

Har YOU think we

You cannot get Sunitary affairs, wiless you have to

pay for it.

The Government quite admit, and wu ara 411 praparou 13855′′

ro admit, what can be done, to make this plašk

sanitary, but we have to cut the gom according to the

cloth. There are not the funds availabio.

You must do the best you can.

Therefore you must look for the minimum ↑

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

וי.

Reference:-

HC.O. 537

13856

A.

Of course, that is your conclusion. I dont feel it my

duty to enter into those questions of expedisney. I can

only advise you as to what is the best.

The Chairman: »

13857 You said just now, that you thought the cubicle questiẻ

had been carried to an extreme. What do you think would

be a reasonable way to deal with this question. What

improvements would you suggest ?

A.

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

I would still suggest that new buildings be built in

such a my sa to render no cubicles necessary. I would

forbid any subicle going up in a new building, because

the ömer has the option of building it, so that it

can be occupied by families, without putting up these

subdivisions.

13858

Then every house would have to be built semidetached ?

He would have to adópt some totally different plan,

to what is usually adopted.

How could he in Queens Road, for instance, How couldini5q

he deal with such a case ?

I am thinking of new buildings, which go up on now

lots. I mean and that is notyet built an, but

5800

A.

: Shelton Hooper:-

1

A.