xia
ما
his Homper
150-4 Q.
$3-
A.
A.
5-6 00
1657
What are we to go by. Hár
particular state of affa
and we try to remedy
to those concerned, und un
must look for the minimum ↑
gr Reaser at
649
mayal etti a 13954
ing from veure past,
stle huen as possible
Har YOU think we
You cannot get Sunitary affairs, wiless you have to
pay for it.
The Government quite admit, and wu ara 411 praparou 13855′′
ro admit, what can be done, to make this plašk
sanitary, but we have to cut the gom according to the
cloth. There are not the funds availabio.
You must do the best you can.
Therefore you must look for the minimum ↑
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
וי.
Reference:-
HC.O. 537
13856
A.
Of course, that is your conclusion. I dont feel it my
duty to enter into those questions of expedisney. I can
only advise you as to what is the best.
The Chairman: »
13857 You said just now, that you thought the cubicle questiẻ
had been carried to an extreme. What do you think would
be a reasonable way to deal with this question. What
improvements would you suggest ?
A.
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
I would still suggest that new buildings be built in
such a my sa to render no cubicles necessary. I would
forbid any subicle going up in a new building, because
the ömer has the option of building it, so that it
can be occupied by families, without putting up these
subdivisions.
13858
Then every house would have to be built semidetached ?
He would have to adópt some totally different plan,
to what is usually adopted.
How could he in Queens Road, for instance, How couldini5q
he deal with such a case ?
I am thinking of new buildings, which go up on now
lots. I mean and that is notyet built an, but
5800
A.
: Shelton Hooper:-
1
A.