CO537-36 — Page 432

ما

T

1395.

Сьной те

Peales

A.

It is difficult to say what grounds they had.

607

13

/ 8.

There must have been some discussion ↑

13.5 71

A.

Yes, there was a discussion, chiefly as to whether the building would front Queens Road, or would not front

it. It was held by some that the building did not from Queens Road, simply because the entrance to the upstairs department was in Peddar Street.

ᄂ.

Oh no, it is not the only entrance. There is an

entrance in Peddar Street, and another in Queens Road ?

13572

A.

Yes, but the building was to be altered, and I got up

and said that that was a cute was of getting out of

the difficulty. There were to be shops in Queens Road.

My objection was based on the fact that you would have

105 Foot building on Queens Road, which is only 50 feet

wide, and when you take off the verandahs on either

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

side, it is only 30 feet.

Q.

Is that building to be put up?

13573

A.

I dont know whether it is to be put up or not, but it

was granted.

24 Q.

Can you give me the date of the Meeting ↑

13574

A.

I cant remember the date of the Meeting, but it was

about a year go. I remember Mr Bryan asked that I

should write a memorandum on that question question of height of building. I wrote that memorandum

the

r Pung va Chun:-

75

A.

but it was submitted to the Board when Mr Bryan was on

holiday.

Was that memorandum of yours circulated to the

Members of the Board ↑

13575

It was writsen with the intention of being submitted to a Committes, appointed by the Board, to consider under what conditions the special exemption should be given.

It went to this Committee, and my recommendation was

not taken any notice of. There were some few

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

36

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-

PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE