CO537-36 — Page 408

ما

هو را در

Mr Jung Wa Chunt-

134244

15 77.

the C. 8. 0. 1010 of 1908.

5.84 & Pearse in

13.424

Is it not strange that an expert like Dr Clark should

adopt the use of what is recommended by a layman ?

A.

What is strange, is that before darbdlosene was adopted

as a disinfectant on a very large scale, that it was

not examined,

Fiber

The Chairman I'

IN ** 10.120 40 25*

04

end ValueT

..

MACAM

{

+

JI.

398

th 9985

baltishall

75

።።

7

I

ન

A.

Mr Lau Chu Pak:-

26

A.

13 425 Do you mean to say it was merely accepted on Inspector

Reidie's recommendation, and used very largely, without

any other recommendation ↑

I gather so. Until that analysis by the Government

Analyst, after a great deal had been used, as far as I

know there was no analysis made, either bacteriological

or chemical.

13.4426

Do you know if it was introduced with the approval of

the Board, at the time ↑

As far as I know, it was introduced with noone's

approval.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

Mr Fung Va Chun:-

chun:-

A.

Who ordered it ↑

13.427

I presume the Secretary would order it. He would write

the actual letter.

Who gave the Secretary instructions to order it ? 13.418

A.

The M. 0. H. I cannot speak for certain.

13.429

What reason do you suppose Inspector Reidie had for se

strongly recommending this Carbolosene ?

Mr Humphreys;-

2

A.

Well, a prima facie one would be, because he found it

an excellent cleanser.

13.4.30

The Chairman 1❤

30

A.

But they are all excellent cleansers. My this frantie

desire to put in Carbolosene in front of anything else ↑

of course, i have heard it suggested that Inspecter Reidie was interested in it in some way, but I have no reason for believing it. It is only suggestions I have

hoard.

How do you mean interested. Did he get ommission' en

the sale of it 9

36

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC