ما
هو را در
Mr Jung Wa Chunt-
134244
15 77.
the C. 8. 0. 1010 of 1908.
5.84 & Pearse in
13.424
Is it not strange that an expert like Dr Clark should
adopt the use of what is recommended by a layman ?
A.
What is strange, is that before darbdlosene was adopted
as a disinfectant on a very large scale, that it was
not examined,
Fiber
The Chairman I'
IN ** 10.120 40 25*
04
end ValueT
..
MACAM
{
+
JI.
398
th 9985
baltishall
75
።።
7
I
ન
A.
Mr Lau Chu Pak:-
26
A.
13 425 Do you mean to say it was merely accepted on Inspector
Reidie's recommendation, and used very largely, without
any other recommendation ↑
I gather so. Until that analysis by the Government
Analyst, after a great deal had been used, as far as I
know there was no analysis made, either bacteriological
or chemical.
13.4426
Do you know if it was introduced with the approval of
the Board, at the time ↑
As far as I know, it was introduced with noone's
approval.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
Mr Fung Va Chun:-
chun:-
A.
Who ordered it ↑
13.427
I presume the Secretary would order it. He would write
the actual letter.
Who gave the Secretary instructions to order it ? 13.418
A.
The M. 0. H. I cannot speak for certain.
13.429
What reason do you suppose Inspector Reidie had for se
strongly recommending this Carbolosene ?
Mr Humphreys;-
2
A.
Well, a prima facie one would be, because he found it
an excellent cleanser.
13.4.30
The Chairman 1❤
30
A.
But they are all excellent cleansers. My this frantie
desire to put in Carbolosene in front of anything else ↑
of course, i have heard it suggested that Inspecter Reidie was interested in it in some way, but I have no reason for believing it. It is only suggestions I have
hoard.
How do you mean interested. Did he get ommission' en
the sale of it 9
36
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC