៩៩៩
عي
Clinton
1526.
& Pentre
539
I have heard lately from Hr Woodoook that it was not submitted, but before Xr Woodoock naid no,
the impressior. that it had been.
Did you and Mr Parkine accept it ?
3/0
A.
Yes.
A.
I was under
13106
13107
Did it affect any other members of the Civil Service ↑
It was only between the Building Authority and the
Sanitary Department.
13.108
Mr Lau Chu Pak:-
08
A.
Was it submitted for the approval of the P. C. M. 0. as
Administrative head of the Department ?
I cant tell you exactly at this date by whom it was
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
passed, but I have a very good idea that he know all
about it.
And did the Director of Public Works know about it $13109
Oh, yes, I think so.
13110
Mr Perkins did not arrive in the Colony until May 1904.
Therefore it is within the last two years ?
The Chairman:-
09
A.
Kr Shelton Hooper:-
10
A.
Yes.
The Chairman:-
1311
A.
129.
13
A.
Did you draw it up with Hr Perkins, or after he
arrived ?
I think after he arrived.
13171
Have you any idea of the proportion of time that is 3/12 devoted by the Sanitary Inspectors to the work of the Building Authority? There are a good many things in
the Act examining buildiggs, making reports and so on, which are really on notices sent out by the Building
Authority.
whick
I should say that the greater part of their time, is given to the inspecting of houses, relates to the
Building Authority, and is in part 3. All notices served
under part 3 must, I understand, be served pro Building
Authority.
Roughly speaking, how much time would be devoted to (3773
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH
NOT TO BE
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.