?.
Clearan
1111600
A.
1320
Have you got any proof of thất ?
Lo man Hers 329
11.116
I have no proof except that on one occasion, Inspector
Reidie sent in a lot of reports against the scavenging
cont.actor.
r Pug Wa Chun:-
Who was he?
11177
#17
A.
Ng Kwong.
The Chairman:-
What year was tha
do you remember ?
11-118
118.
A.
I think it was in 1900.
#9 4.
What contract was ‘• in ?
11-119
A.
The whole town and Peak.
120 Q.
And what was the result of Inspector. Reidie's
complaints?
11.120
A.
The Inspector sent in complaints almo_t every day,
and
asked the contractor why he did not look after the work
properly, and he said the work in the whole town and
and that Inspector
Peak was done in the same manner,
Reidie would like to put in Sham Iu for the Peak
District.
121
&
Did he tell you this himself ?
A.
YOU,
/12 2.
A.
11.121
14.122
That the Inspector was trying to get him out of the
business ?
Yes, so as to sublat the work for the hill district to
Sham Iu.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
123 Q-
What happened after that ?
11-123
A.
The complaints asked who was doing the work for the
Peak District, and it was Sham Iu.
r Lau Chu Pak:-
124
A.
r Fung Wa Chun:-
A.
So that after all, the work as sublet to Sham Iu ?
Yes.
And since that, there was not so much trouble ?
None at all.
11.124
11.12.5
The Chairman.
That was done by Inspector Reidie ?
11126
As
You.
fr Lau Chu Pak:-
107
And what did you suspect of the linswashing and strait!!!2)
36
RECORD OFFICE, OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
LONDON
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.