CO537-35 — Page 17

Sh's Hoger

10.

17

gr Clarks

160

100 Q1- There was no reɛYOL putting in that about the Board ?

At-

No. The reason why it me put in was because of the

tion in the Ordinance.

101 21-

And the Board has authority over thane Officers then and

they could have told them not to do it

101

1

Aim

102.2:-

I doubt that, I doubt if they could.

Suely an Officer of the Board must be servient 7

A:- -It means that the Board doe not go round and was these

inspections, the Board ha, power to do so by its offi.ve

103 Q: They need not be set in motion. That is the view you bot

of it ?

Az-

Howett

104

A:-

Not under 23. No.

The Board may not

No. Bacano Die V

elton Hoeper:- But there mig

105-

coa:alted ?

think it nean.

pake it pa

ngaged to do that rok.

Talanga magarding which we a T

hould have that power. They cant

kik. Going to muti: 24 111

rather tan it. You said the Board itself could found oid Inmpact of itumir. It saye any selco.

may go round and inspect

building

бы

tai ir :

nded ?

At-

T Board by two of it. Monberma

106 91-

Or h, l. 15

+

rembera ?

Aim

I had not say they could not do it. They do not. It,

1078:-

A:-

Bot.

It is not customary in England to have such an Ordinance.

is no distinction between 28 and 84 ↑

The binction is de Muntakhogy night virite and these

7.

be raid by an Ins; ector under warrant of the

› committee of the Board; because you don't

102

103

104

105-

106

107

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

། ། ། ་ ། .................CO. 537

35

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE