Sh's Hoger
10.
17
gr Clarks
160
100 Q1- There was no reɛYOL putting in that about the Board ?
At-
No. The reason why it me put in was because of the
tion in the Ordinance.
101 21-
And the Board has authority over thane Officers then and
they could have told them not to do it
101
1
Aim
102.2:-
I doubt that, I doubt if they could.
Suely an Officer of the Board must be servient 7
A:- -It means that the Board doe not go round and was these
inspections, the Board ha, power to do so by its offi.ve
103 Q: They need not be set in motion. That is the view you bot
of it ?
Az-
Howett
104
A:-
Not under 23. No.
The Board may not
No. Bacano Die V
elton Hoeper:- But there mig
105-
coa:alted ?
think it nean.
pake it pa
ngaged to do that rok.
Talanga magarding which we a T
hould have that power. They cant
kik. Going to muti: 24 111
rather tan it. You said the Board itself could found oid Inmpact of itumir. It saye any selco.
may go round and inspect
building
бы
tai ir :
nded ?
At-
T Board by two of it. Monberma
106 91-
Or h, l. 15
+
rembera ?
Aim
I had not say they could not do it. They do not. It,
1078:-
A:-
Bot.
It is not customary in England to have such an Ordinance.
is no distinction between 28 and 84 ↑
The binction is de Muntakhogy night virite and these
7.
be raid by an Ins; ector under warrant of the
› committee of the Board; because you don't
102
103
104
105-
106
107
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
། ། ། ་ ། .................CO. 537
35
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE