CO537-35 — Page 126

****

185.

A:-

An, He never suit anything.

0:-

79%

had entered into suci. a sottract ?

126

Imgst: Wedelia ex?

Tec you aware, or have you ever haurd that that contractor 799

At- I would have f¬nginet so hañause he undertook to do the work

92

Now that is my case sud a very good one, Ball us of song

8 00

Roo

other work you hav... duspected that has been hail and you

་། ། ་།

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

ག་

Reference:-

................C.O. 537

could not pass ↑

A&M In Bridges Street Nos 1 in 68.

"Jo"

A20

When was this question of Mr Sh 1ton Hoopers so called prom 801

-poty ?

The month before last.

Sketten Appari» ■n was the owner of the Bridgen Strant houses 7

I could not tall you.

Iou remember very watt une Qig ng nam in my cane 9

At- Being ล

88

-

European bana that was diy,

80%

803

I see. The Briigre Birent property ma a Okthesa property 98044

At Tary likely. I could not swear to Slate

91 Wall what happoosd in that caan. Tha úwner had sent is to

the Sanitary Board within the three days it required and

#

then it went to the ganior Inspector and ohne to you. That

happened then that you could not pass 11 ↑

805-

AS-

I was offered Eventy Dollars in that cage too,

Who was the contractor ?

806

At-

1 could not tell you the par- of that contractor.

It was not the kame man ?

807

A 7 m

I don't think so,

A Che Pal Im

Did it not occur to you that you should ask what the man's

808

At-

Mano was ?

I haver did it before and I have got other work to do than

ait down and ask question

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH

REANGED ARM OF THE PUBLIC

OUT

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON