****
185.
A:-
An, He never suit anything.
0:-
79%
had entered into suci. a sottract ?
126
Imgst: Wedelia ex?
Tec you aware, or have you ever haurd that that contractor 799
At- I would have f¬nginet so hañause he undertook to do the work
92
Now that is my case sud a very good one, Ball us of song
8 00
Roo
other work you hav... duspected that has been hail and you
་། ། ་།
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
ག་
Reference:-
................C.O. 537
could not pass ↑
A&M In Bridges Street Nos 1 in 68.
"Jo"
A20
When was this question of Mr Sh 1ton Hoopers so called prom 801
-poty ?
The month before last.
Sketten Appari» ■n was the owner of the Bridgen Strant houses 7
I could not tall you.
Iou remember very watt une Qig ng nam in my cane 9
At- Being ล
88
-
European bana that was diy,
80%
803
I see. The Briigre Birent property ma a Okthesa property 98044
At Tary likely. I could not swear to Slate
91 Wall what happoosd in that caan. Tha úwner had sent is to
the Sanitary Board within the three days it required and
#
then it went to the ganior Inspector and ohne to you. That
happened then that you could not pass 11 ↑
805-
AS-
I was offered Eventy Dollars in that cage too,
Who was the contractor ?
806
At-
1 could not tell you the par- of that contractor.
It was not the kame man ?
807
A 7 m
I don't think so,
A Che Pal Im
Did it not occur to you that you should ask what the man's
808
At-
Mano was ?
I haver did it before and I have got other work to do than
ait down and ask question
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
REANGED ARM OF THE PUBLIC
OUT
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON