CO537-(36-37) — Page 512

235'.

2356

65-

A.

I dont read it that way

1

235

19011

There are many houses 50 to 58 feet. There are a few

19011

that I know, more. Under section 2, when those houses excend 50 feet in depth, they have to have more than

1.5

Kr in hrayat-

:

!

A.

12-9.

50 square feet of area backyard.

I think not, unless they run through to another street. You think not, unless they run through to another 19012 street, but if they run through to another street, surely those houses must be much more

سان

thone up against těh cliff ?

A.

Yes, I should think so.

13 2.

The Chairman:-

14

दे

A.

sanitary than

19013

And being more sanitary, why should they have to have more space?

simply, - here is the ordinance, you cant get

beyond it. It is impossible for an Ordinm:pe to provide for every case.

19044

Is not that a very reasonable case to be provided for, Mr Chatham,

·

the one Mr Waphreys has suppored ?

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

GO. 537

Reference:- Pytanie

37

- NOT TO BE

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-

REPRODUCED

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

And it ought to be met by the Ordinance ?

A.

It should be.

- 15 Qu

A.

I think ac.

16 9.

Witness:-

The Chairman:-

A.

17

A.

The chairman:-

19015

And it is so frequent, it showas he provided for 9 19016

Yes.

There is just one matter I should like to correct with ragard to the earlier portion of my evidence. I think it was the first ocoation I came before this Commission Mr Hooper etated that Mr Wright had been gazetted to act on behalf of the Building Authority, but the notice restricts it to sections 205 to 207 of the Public Health and Buildings Ordinance.

19017

Is that when he was appointed to act for Mr Perkine ?

Yes, it deals with dangerous structures.

< The exact entry is "Executive Council No 773 (Quotes 19018

Gazette).