CO537-(36-37) — Page 510

CUS

J

.

"PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

.........................CO. 537

37

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

Tra Chasman:=

19.001

A.

wr Shelton Hoopert-

02

A.

03 0.

A.

Vr Humphreys: -

04

A.

050.

235.

$235

IW. Chatham C

233

I will go further, and would you not shy they have 19007

maturially benefitted through increased revenue. Is

that no 80,

-

it must be so ?

I suppose if all those dev. lcpaments had not occurred

on those lines, they would have cecurred on other line.

The city would have spread further afield, and rates

would have beenderived from other property.

Then, whose fault is it that these developemente have

taken place on these linus ?

19002

I cant answer that. The Government certainly was remiss

in not taking steps earlier to introduce a great many

of those powers they have today.

And if they had introduced those powere, woula the 19003

Goverment have got as much premim. from their land,

gurrounded by all those restrictions, as they did then "

I think it had a depreciating affect,

I would like you to refer again to geation 105. It/9004

cays there that every existing donastic building shall have a backyard

of at least 50 square feet in arée. and then sect.rn

2

goes on to say "fo "he purpose of this section,

why domestic buildings (other a corner houses) having

tw. main frontages in uifferent atrcuts, shall be

rega. ded as two domestic buildings if the entire depth from frontage to frontage exceeds -0 feat”. Now, if a house exceedɛ 50 feet, would it have to have more than 50 square feet of space unobstructed ? If a house is more than 50 feet in deị th, would it have to have an

unobstructed back yard of more than 50 square feet in

area?

I cannot say that that point has ever come hefore xo.

Fut on the race of this, it appears no.

190057 It appears m. It says distinctly there that when it is more than ) feet, it counts as two domestic buildings,

ala two

angutic buildings must require double the

alace of Ca

Page 510Page 511

!

ए

D