CO537-(36-37) — Page 30

108

Chachan

1889.

155-94 0.

Clock

908

15594

Why should they not have it under sealed cover, marked "confidential to the P. 0. H. 0" and the P. C.

M. O. sends it back under sealed cover to them ?

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

ག་ ་ ག ་

Reference:-

CO. 537

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON DUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH NOT TO OF

A.

95 Qo

A.

9620

A.

97

Q.

A.

989.

A.

Xr Fung Wa Chun:-

19

The Chairman:~

A.

15800

A.

I am afraid the P. C. M. O. has no time to attend to the sealing of letters, or that system could be adopted. There is no objection why the system should not be 15595 adopted f

No, of the M. 0. H. might be authorised to sign the warrant, because he visits the District Offices and can see the Inspector in his om place.

There can be no reasonable objection to having the 15596

warrants dated ?

No, it is purely done to prevent leakage of information. He sees the number of houses that want to be visited,15597

and he knows that on certain evenings after 12 o'clock,

he has a certain amount of leisure and he can arrange. He does not make the visits.

Then he could send the letters to the person who in 19598 making the visits, and the actual date could be filled

up by the person who has to make the visita ?

It is a matter of detail.

Have there been cocasions on which leakage has taken 15599 place ?

We cant say that. All we can say is that there was evidence of overcrowding, and that when the warrant executed, there was no sign of overcrowding. We can only suspect that there was leakage.

15600

Do the lists of those houses to be examined go to the P. 0, M. 0. as a rule ?

The start from the Senior Sanitary Inspector, and they

.

the Secretary.

And w does he send them ?

07 0.

-་

A.

In a spatoh box.

15 két

Page 30Page 31

2