501
Eleder ein.
2055.
1077
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
www.www.C.O. 537
16675
A.
74
Q.
4.
Do you know why ↑
16.673
E um afraid I dont. I will enquire into it. I think it
me merely a matter of difference of opinion, sa
between Dr Clark and myself, as to the way the work
should be done. I think it would be better if we had a
Karopean clerk, to relieve him of a good deal of
office routine, only he seems to prefer not to have one
We understand that pr Clark abolished this post.
So I am told, but I cant vouch for it.
Witness at this stage puta in as exhibits:-
The Chairman:-
75
A
76
Q.
A.
77
0. 8. 0. 2755, 0. 0. D. 178. C. 0. D. 152. c. 0. D.
16.674
271. C. 8. O. 1668 af 1903, and C. 8. 0. 2755 of 1908.
Do you happen to know how Sam In got the contract for16.676-1
linewashing plague infected heures ↑ The Goverment
paid $2.50 a floor. Tenders were callad for, and Dr
Clark from his recollection said he believed that Sam
Iu got it because he was lowest tundarar. The Secretary
who amma afterwards told us that tinders were called
for. Several were received, and the man who made the
lowest tender could not be femå, or failed to put up
his bargain money. There was some hitch, and there was
a question as to whom the contrast should be given to,
and at Dr Clark's recommendation, Sm Iu was given the
contract.
▲ report of that matter came up before me. It is some
years ago, and I cant remember the exact details.
You dont remember that Sam Iu was put before you 116-676
No, I remember the name, that is ali.
Supposing Sam Iu had put forward his tender at $2.50,76 677 and somebody elsa had put forward a tender at $2.25,
should you take Sam Iu's tender at $2,50, if the other
tender was not available. Would you take pains to
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.