CO537-(36-37) — Page 164

2021.

1042

Chemain

A.

1645-3 20

A.

54

Q.

A.

$-5-

Q.

A.

56 Qu

Easton

used, because up to the present we have been unable to

find any report. I can tell you this, that the Analyst

papers we cant find amongst the C. 8. Os¡ That

after a very considerable sum of money had been spent on Carbolosene, which cost 20% more than Jeyes Fluža,

the gecretary raised the question with regard to the cost. It was referred to the Analyst and the Analyst report was unsatisfactory, and the consequence was that

no more Carbolosene was purchased.

I remember that.

16.453

But we have not been able to see any papers as to why

Carbolosene was first adopted.

I can produce them.

The recommendation was from the M. O. H. Dr Clark. He 16454

recommended it on the recommendation of Inspector

Reidie. When the question was raised, the matter was referred to the M. 0. H. who referred it to Inspector

Reidie, who wrote back and said it was an excellent

disinfectant, and it was in use at hon in the

Hospitals in England. Did you know that at the time ↑

hid you know that it was done originally on the recommendation of Inspector Reidie ?

No, I cant remember how it originated, but I can let

you know that when I get the papers.

16453

Do you think it is probable that you were ever told that.

What?

That Carbologene was first introduced on the

16.456

5-8

A.

A.

recommendation of Inspector Reidie ?

I think the N. 0. H. recommended it.

But he did it on the recommendation of Inspector 16.457

Reidis

I dont know that.

Do you accept it as reasonable that a man with Mr 16,458

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

ག་

Reference:-

..................................C.O. 537

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

DEPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICHLY METH

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE