2021.
1042
Chemain
A.
1645-3 20
A.
54
Q.
A.
$-5-
Q.
A.
56 Qu
Easton
used, because up to the present we have been unable to
find any report. I can tell you this, that the Analyst
papers we cant find amongst the C. 8. Os¡ That
after a very considerable sum of money had been spent on Carbolosene, which cost 20% more than Jeyes Fluža,
the gecretary raised the question with regard to the cost. It was referred to the Analyst and the Analyst report was unsatisfactory, and the consequence was that
no more Carbolosene was purchased.
I remember that.
16.453
But we have not been able to see any papers as to why
Carbolosene was first adopted.
I can produce them.
The recommendation was from the M. O. H. Dr Clark. He 16454
recommended it on the recommendation of Inspector
Reidie. When the question was raised, the matter was referred to the M. 0. H. who referred it to Inspector
Reidie, who wrote back and said it was an excellent
disinfectant, and it was in use at hon in the
Hospitals in England. Did you know that at the time ↑
hid you know that it was done originally on the recommendation of Inspector Reidie ?
No, I cant remember how it originated, but I can let
you know that when I get the papers.
16453
Do you think it is probable that you were ever told that.
What?
That Carbologene was first introduced on the
16.456
5-8
A.
A.
recommendation of Inspector Reidie ?
I think the N. 0. H. recommended it.
But he did it on the recommendation of Inspector 16.457
Reidis
I dont know that.
Do you accept it as reasonable that a man with Mr 16,458
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
ག་
Reference:-
..................................C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
DEPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICHLY METH
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE