CO537-(36-37) — Page 139

#101

Фото #правит

1996.

16279:

A.

So a.

87

A.

Q..

A.

8290

A.

83 Q.•

A.

Dr. Ashimin balt

1017

By the ordinance which had then been read a third 16.279

time, three days before. I did not say it was passed.

We had not got the assent. What good did you think it

was submitting it to the Board. Had you any doubt

about it receiving the assent of the Goverment ?

Because the Board had been considering them for months,

and under the ordinanos 1 of 1903, it was the duty of

the Board to make those things, and the Board did

make them on that day, the 17th December 1903.

And you must have thought in your own mind that the 180

Board could not enforce them ▼

No,

I did not think of it.

If you had thought of it, would you have submitted 6287

them. Was it an oversight ? J

It was oversight. I did not submit them, because I

thought the powers had been taken away.

No, no, what I want to get at is this, were you in 16.282

doubt when this Ordinance was actually passed about.

the power of the Board being taken away to make such

Standing Orders ?

Yes, I was in doubt at the time, else I would not have

submitted them to the Board.

That is what I wanted to know, because it locked 80 16283

curious here.

They had taken months of alteration and discussion, and it just happened that they passed four days before the

other ordinance came into force, and of course at the

time I did not know that the powers would be taken

away in that respect.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

36

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

RECORD OFFICE,

162844

34

Q.

Are you aware that a question was asked sometime this

and year in the Sanitary Board, you were abeent,

that the Acting President, before giving an answer on

·

-