1995.
Draslems in ind
1016
A.
No. It was approved by the King on the 24th December.
r Shelton Hooper:-
-
16272
That Ordinance, during the time it was a Bill, I am
speaking of 23 of 1903,
the amending clauses ?
16272
you were conversant with all
A.
Yes.
7.3
Q.
And were you aware that it took away from the Sanitary (6173
Board all the powers to make Standing Orders for the
guidance of their officers ?
A.
Yes.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
wwwmom.C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - HOT TO DE
24 Q.
You were aware of that ?
A.
Yes.
71- 2.
A.
26 Q.
A.
>7
Q.
A.
78 Q.
A.
Are you aware that you submitted them ?
Submitted what ?
16274
16.275
These standing Orders for the approval of the Sanitary
aryinb
Board, on the 17th December 1903.
•
Yes, but you will allow me to inform you that these Standing Orders had been under the discussion of the Board for the whole of that year, and they were finally drafted and approved by the Board on the 17th December 1903. That is to say, six days before
Ordinance 23 was passed.
-
Quite 80,
but you did submit them to the Board as President on the 17th December, knowing that the Bill taking away the powers of the Board to make such Standing Orders had been read the third time on the
14th December, three days previously?
16.277
No, I did not submit them to the Roard, because I knew that. I submitted them to the Board, because they were finally dealt with and approved of by the Board. Knowing that the Board's power was taken away by tha:
Ardinance ?
It was no that it was pasted.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.