CO537-(35-36) — Page 445

CO537 Colonial Confidential Records 理藩院機密檔案 All

1

The Chairman:-

7633

A.

No.

934

951 Mi a cuta ex

Do you think Mr garter that one time, when that

flooring was laid, it was as bad then as it is now ?

I should say it was better.

7633

Αν

7634 Q.

And had deteriorated to a considerable extent, or a

slight :xtent ?

7634

A.

7635-20

A.

7636 Q.

I should say that perhaps it was not parfectly bad,

but never good.It is on the ground level and damp.

And so anybody who had examined it, during the last few76354

years, ought to have condemned it?

Yes.

And supposing you had seen that new concrete in 1902, 76

from what you have seen today, would you have passed it

in 1902 ?

A.

I would not have.

7637

Q.

Do you know when it was laid ?

7637

A.

No I dont know.

Shelton Hooper,

7638

Well, you said it was on the ground level, and damp

there.

7638

A.

The concrete was very moist, and I know from my

experience, the water rises very high there.

763920

But because that was salt water you dont think it would 7639

be more than fresh ?

A.

Yes.

t

el

ves cit

7640 Q

A.

1641 Q.

Is not concrete made with salt water, as good as that 7640

made with fresh ?

Yes, under certain conditions. I would not use salt

water if I had to finish a cement surface.

But you say these were tiles. Would not salt water do 764

as good for mixing it ↑

A.

XO.

X424.

Is it not laid down by the nest authorities that salt 1642

water is equally good for making concrete ↑

A

No, sir.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

› PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-

REVER OF THE PUBLIC

OUT

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

Page 445Page 446

:

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.