CO537-(35-36) — Page 170

602.

679

Jupt: Fittes

ex

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Claust

3796

A:

Q:-

A:-

5797

8:-

A2-

1798 28-

Health would shew a lot of papers missing ?

but if you

That is, if you reported on a remo, reported on a sheet of foolscap, the only think you

could know of it after would be by keeping a ecpy. In No

9 District, I used to keep one, and when I left the District, I turned over all to Inspector Ward - every- thing that I kept there.

That would be the best way to do. It would be a good 96 thing to see that all reports ought to be made on a book

with counterfoils ?

The proper thing would be to have carbon paper, and

indelible pencils.

Everything in duplicate ?

Yes.

5747

Ought they not to be numbered, because if an Inspector 5748 wanted to make away with a copy or the original, he

could do so?

A:-

+

5791

4:-

They ought all to be numbered.

It seems to me that all the papers should be numbered, 3749 and copies kept, and that the District Inspector, when

he makes his report, should enter it at cnce in the District book. Would that be possible to see that there

is a book kept at the District Office ?

The clerks record that.

Reference:-

C.O. 53

537

35

At-

Lau Chu Pak:-

SLOU

When you were in. No 9 District, did you come across anything which made you suspect that certain contractors were working with the Senior Inspector ?

SAUD

At-

No.

Q:-

5207

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

Did any of them come to the office, and ask for work 5201

and information ?

Yes, several. They came for information.

Do you remember their names ?

What sort of information ?

As regards notices, or some paper.

A:-

5-20298-

• Chainkat. 2←

4:-

Page 170Page 171