CO537-(35-36) — Page 150

648.

At-

Mr Perkins.

yr Shelton Ruopert-

Then did you go to the Sanitary people ?

5237

At-

660

Had Nowso

5637

5038 Q8-

At-

5039

Q1-

A:-

>

504098-

No, I have not been to see them. I have heard siños,

but not officially, that the matter was coming before

the Board.

5838

Are you aware that the plans you have sent in are a

contravention of the present law, that they hav to go

before the Board. Is there anything you have applied for

a modification of the Ordinance, or any section of it ?

Not in the latter case, since the plan was amended.

We are speaking of the five weeks.

No, there is nothing there.

50398

Then why do you think it should go before the Board. Do5940

you knew of any reason?

At-

No, I see no reason.

Kr Tump).reyst-

5041

You told me that you had no trouble in getting your houses passed. You Have just told Mr Hooper that you had

to wait two months. Do you think those statements

ocincide ?

A:-

5042 08-

•

5042

That is, you were referring to the building permit.

After the building was completed, you could not get your

certificate from the Sanitary Board or the Building

Authority for two months ?

No we were not kept waiting for a certificate.

Not any time ↑

At-

Q:-

5243

At-

No.

Hr Shelton Hooper!-

5044

5043

365

Have you heard in your experience as an Architect that go44

by making voluntary payments you can accelerate things,

in the way of getting plans and buildinge passed ?

I have never had my Inspector, or any Public Official,

suggest nat to me,

Has it ever been suggested to my contraster smployed skyt

The Chairmant-

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

35

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

Page 150Page 151