CO537-(35-36) — Page 147

Chairman.

QJ-

5205

3006

At-

**

5007 Q7-

645.

657

ใน June,

5005

Well, do you happen to know I understand it is a

éf my windows were question of biceking wɲ wir.dows

blocked up ↑

Originally, they were bunged up with shelves for merchandise, and when these shelves were taken down, they left open the openings through the wall where

windows had been.

What was the result of this payment of $10 ↑ Did it mean stab, that the building was stiål legal, or did it mean that

the building was ilegal ?

dont think it affected the house at all.

5007

Do you think the blocking up of the windows made it an 5007 illegal huilding ?

A:-

No.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

wwwwwww..c.O. 537

35

Shelton Hooperi

SV 08

At-

No, the openings were .

•

•

5009

Qi-

What was the size of the windows ?

Would you not call that an obstruction ?

5008

5009

At-

Five feat by three,A.

J

5010 914

A?.

And how many shelves sorons ?

Four or five.

5010

5011 81-

On brackets on which merchandise was stocked ?

511

At-

You.

I au Chu Pak!-

What did the windows open to ?

5013

5012

A:-

It opened into a staircase, which is not an open yard.

The Chai naak?=

1013

But were not the windoes required by the Building

Ordinance ?

5013

At-

TO.

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - HOT TO BE

If the whole thing had been Blocked up, it would not 5014

matter?

At-

No.

ar Shelton Heaper:❤

50/5

Did he serve any notion the owner ?

5015

AC-

No, I think not.

He only eglied

verba) y ?

sark

I think so.