+

WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1994

CONDUCTED

OF

ON

A

HE STRESSED THAT NONE OF THE CHECKS WOULD BE USED AS A FORM

VETTING POLITICAL

AND NO

BR INVESTIGATION WOULD CANDIDATE'S POLITICAL BELIEFS AND AFFILIATIONS.

MR

TASK OF INTEGRITY SZE SAID

THE IF THE ICAC DID ASSUME

HE CHECKING,

DID

OPERATIONS NOT SEE ANY OBJECTION TO LETTING THE REVIEW COMMITTEE OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE BODY MONITOR AND ADVISE THE PROCEDURES OF INTEGRITY CHECKING.

BODY

LOOK

ON

AT

HOWEVER, GIVEN THE PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT FUNCTION OF THE CHECKS,

то WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE

OUTSIDE ASK ANY INDIVIDUAL CASES.

IT

TO

"THE

RESULTS OF

ΤΟ

THE

HE SAID.

PASSED INDIVIDUAL CHECKING WILL BE ADMINISTRATION FOR APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION PURPOSES,

BILL TO IMPROVE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE INTRODUCED

A BILL AIMING ΤΟ MAKE IMPROVEMENTS AND CORRECTIONS TO

TO RELATING TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND LEGISLATION

REPEAL CERTAIN OBSOLETE PROVISIONS WAS INTRODUCED INTO THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TODAY (WEDNESDAY).

SECOND READING OF THE

OF ADMINISTRATION

JUSTICE

HON

THE

OF

WAS

THE MOVING

THE GENERAL, (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) BILL 1994, THE ATTORNEY

PROCESS IN JEREMY MATHEWS, SAID THE BILL WAS PART OF AN ONGOING LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF KEEPING THE LAW RELATING TO THE ADMINISTRATION

CONSTANT REVIEW, JUSTICE UNDER

IN ORDER ΤΟ ENSURE

IT THAT EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE.

MR MATHEWS SAID THE IMPROVEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BILL INCLUDED PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE RIGHT OF INTERESTED PARTIES TO OBTAIN COURT RECORD; THE POSSIBLE JOINT SUMMARY TRIAL OF JUVENILES; AND THE SETTING UP OF A CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES COMMITTEE.

A

ADULTS

AND

זז

"IT IS ALSO PROPOSED THAT A COURT SHOULD IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES BE ABLE

AND TO GIVE AN ALIBI WARNING TO A DEFENDANT IN WRITING, DISPOSE OF PROPERTY OF NO VALUE, HE SAID.

TO

REFORMS PROPOSED RELATED

ΤΟ

MR MATHEWS SAID SOME OF THE MAGISTRATES.

"THE BILL SEEKS то GIVE THEM THE POWER ΤΟ IMPOSE PARTLY CONSECUTIVE IMPRISONMENT SENTENCES, AND GREATER POWERS TO IMPOSE FINES AND TO AWARD COSTS AND COMPENSATION, HE SAID.

"THE PROVISION EMPOWERING A MAGISTRATE TO IMPRISON A PERSON FOR NON-PAYMENT OF FINES OR COSTS IS BROUGHT UP TO DATE, AND THE PROCEDURE REVIEWING A MAGISTRATE'S DECISION IS REVISED SO THAT AN APPLICATION CAN BE MADE IN WRITING, MR MATHEWS ADDED.

FOR

BE

HE SAID THE LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS WHICH WERE CONSIDERED TO OBSOLETE AND WHICH WERE TO BE REPEALED BY THE BILL INCLUDED PROVISIONS MAGISTRACY, FOR SPECIAL JURIES, MARINE MAGISTRATES, ASSESSORS IN THE SUMMARY PUNISHMENT FOR FALSE TESTIMONY, AND RECOGNISANCES FOR APPEALS.

/IN ADDITION,

Share This Page