17

WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 1991

THE

DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE TWO CLASSB9 OF OFFENCES NAS LAW ABOLISHED IN ENGLAND AND WALES BY THE ENACTMENT OF THE CRIMINAL

THE CRIMINAL LAW ACT 1967 WHICH IMPLEMENTED THE SEVENTH REPORT OF REVISION COMMITTEE.

AS

THE

DISTINCTION

COMMITTEE REMARKED, MR MATHEWS SAID, THE BETWEEN FELONIES AND

AND MISDEMEANOURS HAD BECOME ARCHAIC" COMPLICATED THE LAW UNNECESSARILY" BECAUSE MANY SERIOUS OFFENCES WERE MISDEMEANOURS BUT THERE WERE SOME FELONIES WHICH WERE RELATIVELY MINOR OFFENCES.

MR MATHEWS SAID IN 1986, A WORKING PARTY WAS APPOINTED BY HIS "REDECESSOR TO REVIEW THE MAGISTRATES ORDINANCE AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE GENERALLY.

OFFENCES

THE WORKING PARTY OBSERVED THAT THE CLASSIFICATION OF AS BEING EITHER FELONIES OR MISDEMEANOURS IN HONG KONG APPEARED TO BE DEFUNCT AND SERVED NO USEFUL PURPOSE.

IN

MAY 1987, THE WORKING PARTY PRODUCED A REPORT THAT THE DISTINCTION BE ABOLISHED.

RECOMMENDING

WAS

HONG KONG A THOROUGH SEARCH THROUGH THE WHOLE OF THE LAWS OF

PROVISIONS WHICH EITHER INSTITUTED IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY THEN SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO FELONIES AND MISDEMEANOURS OR DRPENDED UPON A DISTINCTION BEING MADE BETWEEN THEM.

THE

BILINGUAL

LAWS

UP, THUS

THE SEARCH WAS COMPLETED LAST YEAR WHEN INFORMATION SYSTEM ON THE ORDINANCES OF HONG KONG WAS SET ENABLING THE BILL TO BE DRAFTED.

THE MR MATHEWS SAID ABOLITION OF THE DISTINCTION WOULD PROVIDE

TO SIMPLIFY AND MODERNISE OPPORTUNITY

THE CRIMINAL LAW WHILE ELIMINATING A DISTINCTION WHICH NO LONGER SERVED ANY USEFUL PURPOSE.

OF

THE

LAW

AS

CLAUSE 2 OF THE

EFFECT BILL WOULD

THE ABOLITION DISTINCTION BETWEEN FELONY AND MISDEMEANOUR AND PROVIDE THAT THE

APPLICABLE ΤΟ

DESCRIBED OFFENCES HITHERTO MISDEMEANOURS SHOULD IN FUTURE APPLY IN THE CASE OF EVERY OFFENCE.

AND PRACTICE

IN

CLAUSE 3 WAS A GENERAL ADAPTATION PROVISION WHICH REPLACED CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCES AS FELONY OR MISDEMEANOUR

ITH THE SINGLE TERM "OFFENCES".

THERE WERE THREE SCHEDULES TO

THE

LEGISLATION

THE BILL WHICH PROVIDED FOR

OF THE

AMENDMENTS ΤΟ OTHER ORDINANCES AS A RESULT OF THE ABOLITION

ISTINCTION BETWEEN FELONY AND MISDEMEANOUR.

SCHEDULES, WHICH

FURTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE PROVISIONS IN THE *ERE TECHNICAL IN NATURE, WOULD BE INTRODUCED AT THE COMMITTEE STAGE.

DEBATE ON THE BILL WAS ADJOURNED.

/18

Share This Page