14

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1990

RETAILERS FINED FOR SELLING IMPROPERLY LABELLED FOOD

BRANCH

TODAY (FRIDAY) REMINDED

FOOD.

FOOD

THE

THIRD

THE MUNICIPAL SERVICES MANUFACTURERS, WHOLESALERS AND RETAILERS NOT TO SELL PREPACKAGED WHICH DID NOT BEAR

LABELLING PROPER THE SCHEDULE OF THE FOOD AND DRUGS (COMPOSITION AND LABELLING) REGULATIONS.

REQUIRED

BY

THE PENALTY FOR CONTRAVENING THE REGULATIONS IS A MAXIMUM OF $25,000 AND SIX MONTHS' IMPRISONMENT.

FINE

IN THE

THE REMINDER FOLLOWS THREE COURT CASES, HEARD RECENTLY

FINED FROM $1,000 CENTRAL MAGISTRACY, IN WHICH THREE RETAILERS WERE TO $2,000.

CHAI WAS IN THE FIRST CASE, A GINSENG MEDICINE COMPANY IN WAN

RED DATES WITH THE FINED A TOTAL OF $1,000 FOR SELLING PREPACKAGED

OR DESIGNATION OF PLASTIC BAG NOT MARKED OR LABELLED WITH THE NAME

NAME AND ADDRESS THE FOOD, AN INDICATION OF MINIMUM DURABILITY, THE OF THE MANUFACTURER OR PACKER OF THE FOOD, AND THE NUMERICAL COUNT THE CONTENTS OR THE NET WEIGHT OF THE FOOD.

THE

FOOD,

IN THE SECOND CASE, A PROVISION SHOP IN SOUTHERN FINED A TOTAL OF $1,000 FOR SELLING PREPACKAGED FROZEN

OR WITH THE CONTAINER NOT MARKED DESIGNATION OF

LIST OF MINIMUM DURABILITY, STATEMENT OF INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, THE NAME AND PACKER OF THE FOOD, NET WEIGHT OF THE FOOD.

OF

DISTRICT WAS PLAICE FILLET NAME OR

LABELLED INGREDIENTS,

WITH

THE

INDICATION CONDITIONS SPECIAL STORAGE ADDRESS OF THE MANUFACTURER AND THE NUMERICAL COUNT OF THE CONTENTS

AN

OF

OR

OR

OR

THE

IN THE THIRD CASE,

IN

SUPERMARKET

A

JAPANESE,

IN

SOUTHERN

DISTRICT

WAS

ITS

THE

WITH FINED A TOTAL OF $2,000 FOR SELLING PREPACKAGED MAYONNAISE

CONTRAVENING PARAGRAPH 8 OF BOTTLE ONLY MARKED THIRD SCHEDULE OF THE FOOD AND DRUGS (COMPOSITION AND LABELLING) OR LABELLING OF PREPACKAGED REGULATIONS WHICH REQUIRES THE MARKING

LANGUAGE OR FOOD TO BE IN EITHER THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE OR THE CHINESE IN BOTH.

OF THE

THESE THREE RETAILERS WERE

ABOVE

REGULATIONS

MADE

SECTION

PROSECUTED UNDER REGULATION

55 UNDER

OF THE

5(1) PUBLIC

HEALTH AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES ORDINANCE.

THEY WERE ALSO ORDERED TO PAY THE SAMPLE COSTS.

0

/15

Share This Page