WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 1989

28

BILL CLARIFIES POSITION ON ARBITRATION REPRESENTATION

* * *

1989 WILL MAKE

THE ARBITRATION (AMENDMENT) BILL PARTIES TO AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT MAY BE REPRESENTED BY OF THEIR CHOICE.

CLEAR THAT

ANY PERSON

MOVING THE SECOND

OF THE READING

THE ATTORNEY (WEDNESDAY), COUNCIL TODAY MATHEWS, SAID THIS POSITION WAS IN LINE WITH MAJOR CENTRES OF ARBITRATION.

BILL IN

LEGISLATIVE THE

HON GENERAL, THE

JEREMY THE PRACTICE IN OTHER

MR MATHEWS EXPLAINED THAT

AN FOR

ARBITRATION

WAS

THE

ESSENTIALLY RESOLUTION OF A

A

DISPUTE

ARRANGEMENT

PRIVATE CONTRACTUAL OTHERWISE THAN BY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE COURTS.

OF

LAW THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS HE POINTED OUT THAT AT COMMON

IN THE COURTS DID AUDIENCE WHICH BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS ENJOYED

AN ARBITRATION MIGHT BE NOT EXTEND TO ARBITRATIONS. A PARTY IN

AND REPRESENTED BY ANY PERSON OF HIS CHOOSING WHATEVER HIS PROFESSION FROM WHATEVER LEGAL JURISDICTION THAT PERSON MIGHT COME.

COMMON LAW POSITION IN

47 AND

OF THE LEGAL

"HOWEVER, DOUBT HAS BEEN CAST ON THE

45 44, OF SECTIONS RESULT HONG KONG AS A PRACTITIONERS ORDINANCE," MR MATHEWS SAID.

WHILE

PREPARE

CERTAIN

PERSON ACTING AS A NO SECTION 47 LEGAL

SECTION 44 PROVIDED THAT ANY UNQUALIFIED BARRISTER SHOULD BE GUILTY OF AN OFFENCE. SECTION 45 PROVIDED THAT

ACT AS A SOLICITOR, UNQUALIFIED PERSON

PERSON PROVIDED THAT NO DOCUMENTS.

SHOULD UNQUALIFIED

HE NOTED THAT THE QUESTION

SHOULD

OF WHAT EFFECT THESE PROVISIONS MIGHT HAVE IN RELATION TO ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS HAND LED TO A NUMBER OF WIDELY DIFFERING OPINIONS FROM LAWYERS.

IN

THE

AND BARRISTERS ADMITTED

OTHERS CONSIDER THAT FROM APPEARING IN ARBITRATION

"SOME ARGUE THAT ONLY SOLICITORS HONG KONG HAVE A RIGHT OF AUDIENCE. PROVISIONS DO NOT PREVENT ANY PERSON PROCEEDINGS, HE SAID.

r

HE SAID THAT CONFUSION EXISTED AND THE UNSATISFACTORY.

SITUATION WAS CLEARLY

INDICATIONS THAT

THE

UNCERTAINTY

IS KONG

FOR

THE

STRONG "THERE ARE NOW CONSTITUTING A SUBSTANTIAL IMPEDIMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HONG

BECAUSE CONTRACTING AS

FOR ARBITRATIONS AN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE

HONG KONG

VENUE AS A TO NOMINATE PARTIES

UNWILLING ARBITRATIONS IF THEY CANNOT BE SURE THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO USE ADVOCATE OF THEIR CHOICE," HE SAID.

ARE

"THE BILL

Page 30Page 31

Share This Page