4
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1989
1987, ACCORDING
TO THE
OF AT THE END SURVEY, THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 593 COMPANIES WITH
INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT OVERSEAS INVESTMENT
INTEREST IN HONG KONG, REPRESENTING A 9.6 PER CENT INCREASE OVER 1986.
ADDED, MACLEOD
HALF WERE NEARLY ARRANGEMENT WHICH AN
PROVIDED THE MERGING OF THE RESPECTIVE
OF THESE 593 COMPANIES, MR JOINT-VENTURES WITH LOCAL PARTNERS, PARTICULARLY GOOD OPPORTUNITIES FOR EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE OF LOCAL AND OVERSEAS COMPANIES.
KONG, MR MACLEOD SAID TALKING ABOUT THE ATTRACTIONS OF HONG
OUR INVESTMENT HAD PRAISED HAD WHO INVESTORS ENVIRONMENT AND THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT OF OUR PEOPLE.
MANY
COME HERE
ENVIRONMENT "THIS FAVOURABLE
IS
BY SUPPORTED
A GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK, BOTH ENTERPRISES CAN OPERATE
WHICH ADOPTS A PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO ENSURE A STABLE
WITHIN WHICH PRIVATE LEGAL AND PHYSICAL, EFFICIENTLY AND SUCCESSFULLY.
"INTERVENTION IS KEPT TO THE MINIMUM AND IS UNDERTAKEN ONLY IT IS CLEARLY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE ECONOMY," HE STRESSED.
IF
DEPARTMENT WITH
TODAY'S SEMINAR WAS ORGANISED BY THE INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE FROM THE HONG KONG GENERAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
AMONG THE SPEAKERS WERE YEUNG, WHO PRESENTED A SLIDE SHOW OVERSEAS INVESTORS.
THE
DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRY, ON HOW
HONG
CAN
KONG
MR K.Y. WORK FOR
SPEAKERS OTHER
WERE THE
VICTOR DR
CHAIRMAN
WHOSE FUNG,
PRUDENTIAL SPEECH DESCRIBED
THE MANAGING LOH, WHO SHARED
INVESTMENTS LIMITED, UPGRADING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HONG KONG AND CHINA; AND
MR HOGAN DIRECTOR OF INTERPAC CONTAINERS LIMITED, HIS EXPERIENCE AS AN INVESTOR IN HONG KONG WITH PARTICIPANTS.
OF
ASIA
THE
DOCTOR FINED $250,217 FOR MAKING INCORRECT TAX RETURN
THE INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT HAS REMINDED TAXPAYERS THAT MUST FILE CORRECT TAX RETURNS.
PROSECUTION
FOR
THEY
IN
INCORRECT
OF THE
OF A MEDICAL PRACTITIONER THIS FOLLOWS THE
AN MAKING (THURSDAY} TSUEN WAN DISTRICT COURT TODAY RETURN WITHOUT REASONABLE EXCUSE CONTRARY TO SECTION 80(2)(A) INLAND REVENUE ORDINANCE.
WONG THE PRACTITIONER, DR
TUNG-KIN,
PLEADED GUILTY
ΤΟ
THE
CHARGE BEFORE JUDGE FUNG.
HE WAS FINED A TOTAL OF $250,217, THE IMPOSED UNDER THE SECTION.
MAXIMUM
THAT COULD BE
THE COURT ............