WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1989

CLAUSE 9 OF THE BILL PROPOSED

ΤΟ RESTRICT ADMISSION ΤΟ THE

HONG KONG BAR BY UNITED KINGDOM BARRISTERS BY REQUIRING AN APPLICANT:

TO HAVE HAD THREE YEARS' PRACTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM; OR

*

TO BE A HONG KONG PERMANENT RESIDENT; OR

*

TO HAVE HONG KONG AS HIS NATURAL PLACE OF DOMICILE; OR

ΤΟ

HAVE SEVEN YEARS.

BEEN

ORDINARILY

RESIDENT

IN

HONG

KONG FOR

LAWYERS, QUALIFIED

SAID THAT

WITHIN

THE

ON THE ISSUE OF COMMONWEALTH

AND THE THE JUDICIAL ATTORNEY GENERAL'S

(SERVICE IN REGISTRAR GENERAL'S DEPARTMENTS) COMMONWEALTH JURISDICTIONS ORDINANCE, AND THE LEGAL AID

GOVERNMENT

MATHEWS SERVICE AID AND

MR LEGAL THE LEGAL LAWYERS QUALIFIED IN

CHAMBERS,

WERE THERE BY WHO,

VIRTUE OF THE LEGAL OFFICERS

WERE ORDINANCE,

ENTITLED TO PRACTISE

HONG KONG LAW WITHIN THE GOVERNMENT.

AND UNDER IT SOME LAWYERS

THIS ARRANGEMENT WAS LONGSTANDING QUALIFIED IN THE COUNTRIES LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE IN CLAUSE 19 OF BILL HAD PRACTISED HONG KONG LAW FOR MANY YEARS.

THE

LAWS FROM UNLESS THEY OBTAINED A POST GRADUATE CERTIFICATE OF

THEY WERE THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG AND SERVED AS ARTICLED CLERKS

ADMITTED AS HONG HONG

KONG SOLICITORS NOT, HOWEVER, ENTITLED TO BE PRACTISE OUTSIDE THE JUDICIAL AND THE GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICE.

PRACTICE,

ΤΟ

OF LAWS LAW IN THE GOVERNMENT

"AS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE POST GRADUATE CERTIFICATE AND SERVICE IN ARTICLES ARE DESIGNED TO TEACH THE PRACTICE OF HONG KONG AND TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR

то APPLY THOSE REQUIREMENTS CONSIDERS THAT IT

IN THE PRACTICE OF LAWYERS WHO ALREADY HAVE SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE HONG KONG LAW," MR MATHEWS SAID.

IS UNNECESSARY

ΤΟ

то THE BILL PROVIDED THAT THESE LAWYERS SHOULD BE ELIGIBLE

KONG HONG

SOLICITORS, SUBJECT ADMITTED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE AS CERTAIN CONDITIONS BEING MET.

BE

TO

CLAUSE 3 OF THE BILL AND THESE CONDITIONS WERE SET OUT IN

SEVEN YEARS' EMPLOYMENT IN

OR JUDICIAL INCLUDED A REQUIREMENT OF GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICE, THREE OF WHICH MUST HAVE BEEN SPENT ON APPROPRIATE TO THE PRACTICE OF A HONG KONG SOLICITOR.

CLAUSE 4 OF THE BILL IMPOSED, IN EFFECT, AN ANNUAL QUOTA OF

BY ON THE NUMBER OF SOLICITORS WHO COULD ENTER PRIVATE PRACTICE ROUTE.

WORK

10 THIS

THE BILL

Share This Page