+
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1989
AS A
A
HE SAID THAT PUBLIC ANGER AND CONCERN OVER WHAT WAS SEEN
ON THE DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION, POSSIBLE POTENTIAL RESTRAINT
SURELY BE REGARDED AS THROUGH THE MEDIA AND IN OTHER WAYS, MUST
TO CONTINUE HEALTHY AND HEARTENING SIGN THAT HONG KONG PEOPLE WANTED
THAT HAD PROVIDED ALMOST TO ENJOY THE UTMOST FREEDOM IN A SOCIETY ALL THE FREEDOMS EXPECTED IN A DEMOCRATIC TERRITORY.
OF THE MEDIA AND WITHOUT PUBLIC INTEREST
NOT THE LEAST OF THESE HAD BEEN THE RIGHT
MATTERS OF OTHERS TO ISSUE INFORMATION ON FEAR OF PROSECUTION, MR MCGREGOR ADDED.
TERRITORY IN ASIA AND THE MR MCGREGOR NOTED THAT NOT EVERY
IN HONG KONG TO WHICH EXISTED WIDE FREEDOM PACIFIC ENJOYED THE
PARTICULARLY TO
ISSUES, PUBLIC DISCUSS TO PRINT AND PUBLISH,
THE POLITICAL ISSUES OR THOSE HAVING SOME BEARING ON THE POLITICAL SYSTEM.
DEVELOPMENT OF
TIMES, IT WAS MANIFESTLY
SHOULD
DO NOTHING THE FREEDOM
HE STRESSED THAT IN THESE CHANGING
THAT
HONG THE
KONG GOVERNMENT IMPORTANT ENDANGER, OR TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION OF ENDANGERING, THEM RIGHT OF PEOPLE AND THE MEDIA TO DISCUSS AND TO REPORT.
ΤΟ
AND
то A DEMOCRATIC
HONG SHAPING
KONG'S A FREE SOCIETY WBRE
FINALLY, HE SAID THAT A FREE PRESS WAS VITAL
WHO THOSE
WERE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND THAT FUTURE WOULD BE WISE TO LEARN THAT FREEDOMS IN WORTH MAKING EVERY EFFORT TO RETAIN,
CONSTANT REVIEW OF LAW TO SAFEGUARD HUMAN RIGHTS
OF
THE PUBLIC ORDER ORDINANCE CAN THE REPEAL OF SECTION 27 OF
THE BEGINNING
PEOPLE'S HONG KONG ONLY BE TAKEN AS THE END OF REPULSION AGAINST PROVISIONS THAT UNDERMINED THEIR BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS,
CHE-HUNG SAID IN THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL DR THE HON LEONG
(WEDNESDAY).
TODAY
(AMENDMENT)
TO
SPEAKING IN THE RESUMED DEBATE ON THE PUBLIC ORDER BILL 1988, DR LEONG SAID WHETHER WE LIKED IT OR NOT, HONG KONG WAS
POLITICAL COME ACROSS MORE PUBLIC SENTIMENTS RELATING TO THE CHANGING SITUATIONS AND CONSERVATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DURING THE RUN-UP TO 1997.
HE THEREFORE URGED THE GOVERNMENT AND THE
IN
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL CONSTANT REVIEWS ON GREY AREAS TO BE ALERT ENOUGH AND TO MAKE EXISTING LEGISLATION THAT MIGHT INFRINGE BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.
/IN SUPPORT