HE SAID THE

RESIDENTS

31

WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1988

COMPLAINED OF

EXCESSIVE NOISE FROM

FACTORIES AROUND THEM.

AND, ON ANALYSIS, IT APPEARED THAT THE RESIDENTIAL BLOCKS IN AN AREA WHICH HAD

WERE RECENTLY BEEN ZONED BOARD AS "COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL" ALTHOUGH THE AREA

BY THE TOWN PLANNING AN INDUSTRIAL ZONE.

WAS FORMERLY IN

THE RESULT WAS THAT THE EXISTING FACTORY BUILDINGS IN THE WERE NOT REQUIRED TO BE DEMOLISHED.

ZONE

OF HAVING BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

THE CASE UNDERLINED THE IMPORTANCE CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN THE TOWN PLANNING AND AUTHORITIES, HE SAID.

MR LEE SAID ANOTHER DIFFICULTY HIGHLIGHTED GARDENS CASE WAS THAT EACH OF THE

BY THE TSURN TAK FACTORY INDUSTRIAL BLOCK APPARENTLY DID NOT

UNITS IN THE RELEVANT EMIT EXCESSIVE CONTRAVENE THE PROVISIONS OF THE BILL, BUT THE CUMULATIVE

NOISE AS WOULD THE NOISE COMING

EFFECT OF FROM ALL THE UNITS IN CONSTITUTE SUCH AN OFFENCE.

THE SAME BLOCK WOULD

UNDER THE PRESENT SYSTEM AN OPERATOR OF A LARGE EMITTED EXCESSIVE NOISE COULD BE DEALT WITH BY LAW: BUT FACTORY AREA HAD BEEN OCCUPIED BY SEPARATE UNITS, EMITTING JOINTLY THE SAME LEVEL OF NOISE,

OPERATORS

COULD BE PROSECUTED.

THEN

FACTORY WHICH IF THE SAMB IN DIFFERENT NONE OF THEM

HONG

THIS WAS NOT LOGICAL, HE SAID, ADDING SHOULD ADDRESS THE PROBLEM URGENTLY AS IT OCCURRED FREQUENTLY IN

THAT THE GOVERNMENT KONG.

TURNING TO THE QUESTION OF PENALTY, MR LEE NOTED THAT WHEN WHITE BILL RELATING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER WAS PUBLISHED IN MARCH YEAR, IT CONTAINED A PENALTY CLAUSE OF A MAXIMUM FINE OF TWO YEARS OF IMPRISONMENT FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW.

THE LAST

$100,000 OR

LOBBY, THE RANGING BETWEEN

BUT UPON THE OBJECTIONS OF THE INDUSTRIALIST PRESENT PENALTIES WERE CONFINED TO FINES ALONE, $5,000 AND $100,000,

ΤΟ ENCOURAGE

50,

"CONCERNED GROUPS HAVE EXPRESSED THE VIEW THAT THIS IS LIKELY

BLATANT BREACHES OF THE LAW BY OPERATORS WHENEVER IT IS IN THEIR FINANCIAL INTEREST

CERTAIN FACTORY EXAMPLE, WHEN GOODS HAVE TO BE PRODUCED

TO DO

FOR THEIR CONTRACT COMMITMENTS,

IN ORDER TO MEET

HE SAID.

URGENTLY

HE SUGGESTED THAT IT WOULD BE SENSIBLE TO HAVE IMPRISONMENT A PENALTY FOR PERSISTENT OFFENDERS IN ORDER TO GIVE REAL TEETH TO BILL.

AS

THE

MR LEE

Share This Page