9
TUESDAY, MAY 31, 1988
THE
ANNOUNCEMENT
IN FACT
TO THAT TURNED NOT BEEN GROUND
THE
THAT HAS AID
SIR GEOFFREY: WELL, MY REACTION TO EFFECT IS OBVIOUSLY TO WELCOME IT IN SO FAR AS IT IS INTO PRACTICE. THERE HAVE BEEN EARLIER STATEMENTS THAT HAVE COMPLETELY FULFILLED. BUT WHAT I WANT TO SEE IS ACTION ON IN THE FORM OF THE WITHDRAWAL OF VIETNAMESE TROOPS. WHEN HAPPENED WILL BE THE TIME TO CONSIDER WHETHER OR NOT ANY ECONOMIC ARRANGEMENTS WILL BE MADE. AS YOU WILL HAVE POSITIVELY TO THE DECISION BY THE FROM AFGHANISTAN, BY DOUBLING THE AID WE REFUGEES THERE.
SEEN, WE REACTED SOVIET UNION TO WITHDRAW ALREADY MAKE
QUITE TROOPS AVAILABLE TO
MENTIONED IN AREAS THE
CHENG YEE-KWAN (COMMERCIAL RADIO): SIR, YOU HAVE YOUR LUNCHEON SPEECH YESTERDAY THAT THERE ARE STILL DIFFICULT DUE TO THE RESULT IN THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE BASIC LAW, SUCH AS FORMATION OF THE FIRST SAR GOVERNMENT AND ITS ELECTION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE. WHAT SORT OF DIFFICULTIES ARE YOU REFERRING TO? IT HAVE ANY RELATION WITH THE ANNEX III IN THE FIRST DRAFT?
THE FIRST DOES
SIR GEOFFREY: WITH THE?
CHENG YEE-KWAN: WOULD IT HAVE ANY RELATION WITH THE, ΤΟ PROPOSAL SUGGESTED IN THE ANNEX 111 IN THE FIRST DRAFT?
THE
SIR GEOFFREY: OH, ANNEX III. WELL, THE POINT IS THAT SUBJECT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, AND THE
THE VERY ANNEXES, CONTAIN ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF TACKLING ALL THESE TOPICS. BUT I MERELY IDENTIFIED TOPICS WHICH VIRTUALLY BY DEFINITION DO REQUIRE FURTHER STUDY.
CHENG YER-KWAN; SO WHAT ARE THE DIFFICULTIES YOU ARE
THEM AS
REFERRING
TO?
SIR GEOFFREY: TUOSE THAT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED REPORTED TO ME, THAT I HAVE EVEN SEEN MENTIONED IN SOME KONG PRESS.
WITH ME AND OF THE HONG
NICK GRIFFIN (ATV): SIR, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND NOT AS THE FOREIGN SECRETARY, WOULD YOU BE PREPARED TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHERE EVERY CHAPTER OF THE BASIC LAW IS OPEN TO THE INTERPRETATION OF THE NATIONAL PEOPLE'S CONGRESS?
SIR GEOFFREY: I THINK I SHOULD BE PREPARED ΤΟ LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHERE THE JOINT DECLARATION HAS BEEN FAITHFULLY REFLECTED IN THE BASIC LAW.
THOSE
CHAN BO-SHUN (HONG KONG ECONOMIC JOURNAL); SINCE OFFICIALS IN HONG KONG AND ALSO THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCILLORS HAVE ALREADY CONFIRMED THAT THE TERM "FIRST ASYLUM TERRITORY" HAS NO CLEAR DEFINITION, DO YOU THINK THAT IT MEANS THAT THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT CAN PRESERVE AS THE FIRST ASYLUM TERRITORY AND CHANGE THE WAY THAT THEY DEAL WITH THE VIETNAMESE REFUGEES AT THE SAME TIME, FOR EXAMPLE JUST TO CHANGE IDENTITY TO BECOME II (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS)?
/10